[PATCH 0/2] security: clarify that some code is really non-modular
From: Paul Gortmaker
Date: Wed Dec 09 2015 - 17:38:21 EST
The goal is to ensure that non-modular code doesn't appear modular
just by accident. Here we have two more commits to do that and they
are of the trivial nature (i.e. no ".remove" functions deleted and
no need to block any unbind actions). We just change the
registration functions to be the non modular versions and adjust
the include headers to match.
Paul Gortmaker (2):
security/keys: make big_key.c explicitly non-modular
security/integrity: make ima/ima_mok.c explicitly non-modular
security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 5 ++---
security/keys/big_key.c | 15 +--------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-ima-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-ima-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2.6.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/