[PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Make rcu_gp_init() be bool rather than int

[Paul E. McKenney]

The return value from rcu_gp_init() is always used as a bool, so
this commit makes it be a bool.

Reported-by: Iftekhar Ahmed <ahmedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 87b604d0b0d2..01a90a3bdf79 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1814,9 +1814,9 @@ static void rcu_gp_slow(struct rcu_state *rsp, int delay)
 }
 
 /*
- * Initialize a new grace period.  Return 0 if no grace period required.
+ * Initialize a new grace period.  Return false if no grace period required.
  */
-static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+static bool rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
 	unsigned long oldmask;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp;
@@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	if (!READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) {
 		/* Spurious wakeup, tell caller to go back to sleep.  */
 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 	}
 	WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, 0); /* Clear all flags: New grace period. */
 
@@ -1837,7 +1837,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 		 * Not supposed to be able to happen.
 		 */
 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
-		return 0;
+		return false;
 	}
 
 	/* Advance to a new grace period and initialize state. */
@@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 		WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity, jiffies);
 	}
 
-	return 1;
+	return true;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/