Re: [PATCH perf/core 14/22] perf: Fix dso__load_sym to put dso
From: 'Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo'
Date: Thu Dec 10 2015 - 14:26:34 EST
Em Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:52:46AM +0000, åæéå / HIRAMATUïMASAMI escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:acme@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> >Em Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:11:18AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> >> @@ -1045,6 +1045,8 @@ int dso__load_sym(struct dso *dso, struct map *map,
> >> /* kmaps already got it */
> >> map__put(curr_map);
> >> dsos__add(&map->groups->machine->dsos, curr_dso);
> >> + /* curr_map and machine->dsos already got it */
> >> + dso__put(curr_dso);
> >> dso__set_loaded(curr_dso, map->type);
> >> } else
> >> curr_dso = curr_map->dso;
> >
> >Right, to make the code smaller, how about doing it this way, i.e. drop
> >the reference once we have that curr_dso object with a ref held by
> >curr_map, if curr_map doesn't get it, then we don't need and will drop
> >it anyway:
>
> But as above code, curr_dso is passed to dsos__add after curr_map is put.
> Even if the curr_map is hold by kmaps, isn't the kmaps controlled by other pthreads?
> If no, I'm OK if we move above dsos__add() before map__put() for safety, because
> curr_dso is held by curr_map at that point.
Good catch, so I'll do as you suggest and move dsos__add() to before we
drop that map reference, as then we're sure that we hold it and it holds
the dso.
> Thank you,
>
> >
> >diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> >index 53f19968bfa2..84d787074152 100644
> >--- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> >+++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> >@@ -1026,8 +1026,8 @@ int dso__load_sym(struct dso *dso, struct map *map,
> > curr_dso->long_name_len = dso->long_name_len;
> > curr_map = map__new2(start, curr_dso,
> > map->type);
> >+ dso__put(curr_dso);
> > if (curr_map == NULL) {
> >- dso__put(curr_dso);
> > goto out_elf_end;
> > }
> > if (adjust_kernel_syms) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/