Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3

[Ross Zwisler]

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:33:33AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:54:58AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:39:32PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > I've verified that this fixes all three failing xfstests reported in this mail.
> > > Thanks!
> > 
> > Hey Dave,
> > 
> > Are you planning on pushing this fix for v4.4?
> 
> No plans to right now - ENOSPC is a corner case that most users
> won't be anywhere near, especially for experimental functionality on
> hardware nobody actually has....

Really?  I realize that it may be a case that most users won't actually hit,
but it is a 5 line change that fixes four xfstests regressions between v4.3 and
v4.4 for my DAX testing...

Is there a strong reason *not* to push it in the v4.4 cycle?  I'm trying to
clear up all xfstests differences between DAX and non-DAX, and this would help
quite a bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/