Re: [BUG] checkpatch warning default switch case
From: Geyslan G. Bem
Date: Fri Dec 11 2015 - 16:56:45 EST
2015-12-11 17:21 GMT-03:00 Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2015-12-11 17:08 GMT-03:00 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 16:34 -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Running
>>> scripts/checkpatch.pl -f drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c
>>>
>>> I got this
>>> ...
>>> ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxE)
>>> #496: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c:496:
>>> + default:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> 496: default:
>>> ehci_dbg (ehci,
>>> "periodic frame %d bogus type %d\n",
>>> frame, type);
>>> }
>>>
>>> It seems a correct use of default switch case. Maybe the test concerns
>>> to ternary conditional.
>>>
>>> Let me know.
>>
>> Yes, it's a checkpatch defect.
>>
>> It's because a c99 style comment is immediately before this line.
>>
>> switch (foo) {
>> case 1:
>> break;
>> // foo
>> default:
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> emits this ERROR
>>
>> I suggest you fix the comment and the message will go away.
> Ok, I'm fixing it.
>
> Tks.
>>
>> Andy? Do you care to fix this defect?
>>
>
Another false positive:
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
#1570: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c:1570:
+ else {
+ start = (stream->ps.phase << 3) +
stream->ps.phase_uf;
+ }
The code:
if (stream->ps.phase == NO_FRAME) {
int done = 0;
...
reserve_release_iso_bandwidth(ehci, stream, 1);
}
/* New stream is already scheduled; use the upcoming slot */
else {
start = (stream->ps.phase << 3) + stream->ps.phase_uf;
}
There's a C89 comment before the else branch and immediately before
that an empty line. They, I think, are confusing the parser.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Geyslan G. Bem
> hackingbits.com
--
Regards,
Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/