[patch] regulator: pv88090: logical vs bitwise AND typo
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Sat Dec 12 2015 - 07:39:41 EST
These were supposed to be bitwise AND instead of logical. Also kernel
style is for the operator to be on the first line and I removed some
extra parenthesis.
Fixes: c90456e36d9c ('regulator: pv88090: new regulator driver')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
At the end we use these values for:
index = ((range << 1) | conf2);
So, in theory, "index" is a number between 0-3. The problem is that we
use it as an index into the pv88090_buck_vol[] array which has only 3
elements so it's potentially reading one step beyond then end. Possibly
the hardware spec says that range and conf2 can not both be set at the
same time. I don't know. James, can you take a look at this?
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pv88090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pv88090-regulator.c
index 3ec5f2b..29c16d9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pv88090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pv88090-regulator.c
@@ -392,17 +392,17 @@ static int pv88090_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- conf2 = ((conf2 >> PV88090_BUCK_VDAC_RANGE_SHIFT)
- && PV88090_BUCK_VDAC_RANGE_MASK);
+ conf2 = (conf2 >> PV88090_BUCK_VDAC_RANGE_SHIFT) &
+ PV88090_BUCK_VDAC_RANGE_MASK;
ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap,
PV88090_REG_BUCK_FOLD_RANGE, &range);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- range = ((range
- >> (PV88080_BUCK_VRANGE_GAIN_SHIFT + i - 1))
- && PV88080_BUCK_VRANGE_GAIN_MASK);
+ range = (range >>
+ (PV88080_BUCK_VRANGE_GAIN_SHIFT + i - 1)) &
+ PV88080_BUCK_VRANGE_GAIN_MASK;
index = ((range << 1) | conf2);
pv88090_regulator_info[i].desc.min_uV
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/