[PATCH 4.2 16/61] net/mlx4_core: Fix sleeping while holding spinlock at rem_slave_counters

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit f5adbfee72282bb1f456d52b04adacd4fe6ac502 ]

When cleaning slave's counter resources, we hold a spinlock that
protects the slave's counters list. As part of the clean, we call
__mlx4_clear_if_stat which calls mlx4_alloc_cmd_mailbox which is a
sleepable function.

In order to fix this issue, hold the spinlock, and copy all counter
indices into a temporary array, and release the spinlock. Afterwards,
iterate over this array and free every counter. Repeat this scenario
until the original list is empty (a new counter might have been added
while releasing the counters from the temporary array).

Fixes: b72ca7e96acf ("net/mlx4_core: Reset counters data when freed")
Reported-by: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c |   39 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
@@ -4934,26 +4934,41 @@ static void rem_slave_counters(struct ml
 	struct res_counter *counter;
 	struct res_counter *tmp;
 	int err;
-	int index;
+	int *counters_arr = NULL;
+	int i, j;
 
 	err = move_all_busy(dev, slave, RES_COUNTER);
 	if (err)
 		mlx4_warn(dev, "rem_slave_counters: Could not move all counters - too busy for slave %d\n",
 			  slave);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(mlx4_tlock(dev));
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(counter, tmp, counter_list, com.list) {
-		if (counter->com.owner == slave) {
-			index = counter->com.res_id;
-			rb_erase(&counter->com.node,
-				 &tracker->res_tree[RES_COUNTER]);
-			list_del(&counter->com.list);
-			kfree(counter);
-			__mlx4_counter_free(dev, index);
+	counters_arr = kmalloc_array(dev->caps.max_counters,
+				     sizeof(*counters_arr), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!counters_arr)
+		return;
+
+	do {
+		i = 0;
+		j = 0;
+		spin_lock_irq(mlx4_tlock(dev));
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(counter, tmp, counter_list, com.list) {
+			if (counter->com.owner == slave) {
+				counters_arr[i++] = counter->com.res_id;
+				rb_erase(&counter->com.node,
+					 &tracker->res_tree[RES_COUNTER]);
+				list_del(&counter->com.list);
+				kfree(counter);
+			}
+		}
+		spin_unlock_irq(mlx4_tlock(dev));
+
+		while (j < i) {
+			__mlx4_counter_free(dev, counters_arr[j++]);
 			mlx4_release_resource(dev, slave, RES_COUNTER, 1, 0);
 		}
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(mlx4_tlock(dev));
+	} while (i);
+
+	kfree(counters_arr);
 }
 
 static void rem_slave_xrcdns(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/