Re: [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:56:02AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > According to Peter Zijlstra, irq_common_data::state_use_accessors is not
> > designed for public use. Therefore make it private so that people who
> > write code accessing it directly will get blamed by sparse.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/irq.h | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> > index 3c1c967..0b8f273 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct irq_domain;
> >   * @msi_desc:		MSI descriptor
> >   */
> >  struct irq_common_data {
> > -	unsigned int		state_use_accessors;
> > +	unsigned int		__private state_use_accessors;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> >  	unsigned int		node;
> >  #endif
> > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ enum {
> >  	IRQD_FORWARDED_TO_VCPU		= (1 << 20),
> >  };
> >  
> > -#define __irqd_to_state(d)		((d)->common->state_use_accessors)
> > +#define __irqd_to_state(d) ACCESS_PRIVATE((d)->common, state_use_accessors)
> >  
> >  static inline bool irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(struct irq_data *d)
> >  {
> 
> We should probably #undef that one once we're done with it.. Thomas?

Probably.
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/