Re: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection
From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Mon Dec 14 2015 - 07:45:33 EST
>> Can you accept the proposed changes around the affected memory allocations?
>
> Just leave it as-is if there is no reason.
I suggest to make the implementation of the function "mgc_process_recover_log"
a bit more efficient.
>> Do you prefer to stash any changes together for a bigger update step?
>
> Yes. Patches 5 and 6 would be easier to review if they were folded into
> one patch.
I do not like patch squashing for my update suggestions here.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/