Re: [PATCH 4/8 v4] thermal: rcar: retern error rcar_thermal_get_temp() if no ctemp update
From: Kuninori Morimoto
Date: Mon Dec 14 2015 - 18:55:42 EST
Hi Eduardo
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> > @@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int rcar_thermal_update_temp(struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv)
> >
> > dev_dbg(dev, "thermal%d %d -> %d\n", priv->id, priv->ctemp, ctemp);
> >
> > - priv->ctemp = ctemp;
> > ret = 0;
> > err_out_unlock:
> > + priv->ctemp = ctemp;
> > mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > return ret;
>
> I believe the problem here is actually the lack of error
> handling/propagation. Are you sure you want to write to parameter
> in the fail path ?
>
> rcar_thermal_update_temp already returns error code when it fails
> to read temperature. Don't you think it would make more sense to fix the
> places that call rcar_thermal_update_temp to properly handle its return
> value and propagate that error code when necessary?
Thanks. But the logic is that
priv->ctemp will be 0 in error cases, and it will be reported as
dev_err() in rcar_thermal_get_current_temp()
The problem was that priv->ctemp will not be updated
in error case of rcar_thermal_update_temp().
but user can call get_temp (it doesn't call
rcar_thermal_update_temp() if interrupt was supported).
In such case, user will get old thermal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/