Re: [RFCv6 PATCH 09/10] sched: deadline: use deadline bandwidth in scale_rt_capacity

[Luca Abeni]

On 12/15/2015 01:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:50:14AM +0100, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > On 12/15/2015 05:59 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>
> > > The 2nd definition is used to compute the remaining capacity for the
> > > CFS scheduler. This one doesn't need to be updated at each wake/sleep
> > > of a deadline task but should reflect the capacity used by deadline in
> > > a larger time scale. The latter will be used by the CFS scheduler  at
> > > the periodic load balance pace
>
> > Ok, so as I wrote above this really looks like an average utilisation.
> > My impression (but I do not know the CFS code too much) is that the mainline
> > kernel is currently doing the right thing to compute it, so maybe there is no
> > need to change the current code in this regard.
> > If the current code is not acceptable for some reason, an alternative would
> > be to measure the active utilisation for frequency scaling, and then apply a
> > low-pass filter to it for CFS.
>
> So CFS really only needs a 'vague' average idea on how much time it will
> not get. Its best effort etc., so being a little wrong isn't a problem.
>
> The current code suffices, but I think the reason its been changed in
> this series is that they want/need separate tracking for fifo/rr and
> deadline in the next patch, and taking out deadline like proposed was
> the easiest way of achieving that.
Ah, ok. Thanks for explaining.
So, I agree that this patch is not a good idea for estimating the average
utilisation needed by CFS.



				Luca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/