Re: [PATCH 3/9] Drivers: hv: utils: introduce HVUTIL_TRANSPORT_DESTROY mode

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Tue Dec 15 2015 - 12:10:42 EST


Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: devel [mailto:driverdev-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>> Of K. Y. Srinivasan
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:02
>> To: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/9] Drivers: hv: utils: introduce HVUTIL_TRANSPORT_DESTROY
>> mode
>>
>> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> When Hyper-V host asks us to remove some util driver by closing the
>> appropriate channel there is no easy way to force the current file
>> descriptor holder to hang up but we can start to respond -EBADF to all
>> operations asking it to exit gracefully.
>>
>> As we're setting hvt->mode from two separate contexts now we need to use
>> a proper locking.
>>
>> ...
>> @@ -99,6 +107,10 @@ static unsigned int hvt_op_poll(struct file *file,
>> poll_table *wait)
>> hvt = container_of(file->f_op, struct hvutil_transport, fops);
>>
>> poll_wait(file, &hvt->outmsg_q, wait);
>> +
>> + if (hvt->mode == HVUTIL_TRANSPORT_DESTROY)
>> + return -EBADF;
>> +
>> if (hvt->outmsg_len > 0)
>> return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
>
> Hi Vitaly,
> Should hvt_op_poll() return -EBADF -- I think it probably
> should return POLLERR or POLLHUP?

Oh, sorry, my bad -- hvt_op_poll() returns unsigned int and -EBADF is
definitely inappropriate. I see this patch was already merged to
char-misc-testing so I'll send a follow-up patch to fix things up.

Thanks!

--
Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/