RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

[Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy]

Hi Stephen,

  Sorry. It's my mistake. In the first patch set, I tested it with "irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOREQUEST);" and in the v2 patch set the old one got in.

Regards
Dhananjay
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:08 AM
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Linus,

After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe':
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_irq_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
    ^
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:23: error: 'IRQF_VALID' undeclared (first use in this function)
    set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
                       ^

Caused by commit

  8bfcbbbcabe0 ("pinctrl: nsp: add gpio-a driver support for Broadcom NSP SoC")

set_irq_flags was removed before v4.3-rc2 ...

I have used the gpio tree from next-20151215 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/