Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: bcm2835: Add PWM clock support to the device tree

[Remi Pommarel]

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:09:47PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Hi Remi,
> >
> > Am 07.12.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Remi Pommarel:
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 10:16:25PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >>> Hi Remi,
> >>>
> >>> please send this patch to devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Ok, just to be sure I understand the process here. I should resend a new
> >> version of the whole patchset including the devicetree mailing list as
> >> recipent. Then the first 3 patches will eventually get pushed by a clock
> >> subsystem maintainer. And finally this last patch will be pushed by a
> >> devicetree maintainer.
> >>
> >> Am I right here ?
> >
> > sorry for the confusion. I mean that you send a copy to 
> > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so subscribers have a chance to review.
> >
> > I'm not sure but according to your subject you suggest that this dts 
> > patch should go through clock subsystem which isn't optimal. This should 
> > be better applied by Stephen or Eric.
> 
> It would be applied by me, but that's for me to worry about, not the
> patch submitter.  The subject prefix would be "ARM: bcm2835: ", but
> that's trivial for me to fix when applying, not the kind of thing worth
> asking for a respin for.

Thanks for review.

I'll submit dt patch to devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for review. Is it better
to submit the whole patchset (patch 1 to 4) to provide some context for the
device tree patch or just this patch alone ?

Best Regards,

-- 
Remi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/