Re: [PATCH 00/10] bpf samples: Uses libbpf in tools/lib to do BPF operations

[Wangnan (F)]

On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
> > Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
> > another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
> >
> > In patchset:
> >
> >   Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to support
> >   samples,
> >
> >   Patch 8/10 adds utils.[ch], which creates similar API like old
> >   bpf_load.c and libbpf.c.
> >
> >   Patch 9/10 replace all sampels to use API provides by utils.[ch] and
> >   libbpf.
> >
> >   Patch 10/10 removes unneeded files.
> Which tree did you use for your patches? I tried to apply them against
> mainline and net-next which didn't really work out.

These patches based on Arnaldo's 'perf/core' because of those libbpf
changes.

Which tree is the right one for this? net-next?

Thank you.

> cheers,
> daniel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/