Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Raspberry Pi power domains

[Eric Anholt]

Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 15 December 2015 at 22:40, Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Since the pm_genpd_exit() patch is still going through review, and
>> other drivers in the tree just ignore the error cases, Ulf offered to
>> merge the series as a builtin driver not depending on that interface.
>> We still avoid dangling pointer references, by just continuing with
>> probing if of_genpd_add_provider_onecell() fails.  We can easily go
>> back and update the driver when a pm_genpd_exit() lands.
>>
>> Alexander Aring (3):
>>   ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver
>>   dt-bindings: add rpi power domain driver bindings
>>   ARM: bcm2835: Add the Raspberry Pi power domain driver to the DT.
>>
>> Eric Anholt (1):
>>   ARM: bcm2835: Define two new packets from the latest firmware.
>>
>>  .../bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-power.txt |  47 ++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi                 |  11 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi                     |   2 +-
>>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig                          |  10 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile                         |   1 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/raspberrypi-power.c              | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/dt-bindings/arm/raspberrypi-power.h        |  41 ++++
>>  include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h         |   2 +
>>  8 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-power.txt
>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-bcm/raspberrypi-power.c
>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/arm/raspberrypi-power.h
>>
>> --
>> 2.6.2
>>
>
> Besides a nitpick for patch2, I would also reverse the order of patch3
> and patch2. DT docs should go in before the actual parsing of the new
> bindings/compatibles.
>
> Anyway, for the hole series, you may add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Would your tree be pulling the series (since it's power domains), or
should I (since it's SOC stuff)?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature