Re: [PATCH v4] Fix INT1 Recursion with unregistered breakpoints

[Jeff Merkey]

On 12/19/15, Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 19:13 -0700, Jeff Merkey wrote:
>
>> @@ -519,6 +528,18 @@ static int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args
>> *args)
>>  	    (dr6 & (~DR_TRAP_BITS)))
>>  		rc = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>
>> +	/*
>> +	* if we are about to signal to
>> +	* do_debug() to stop further processing
>> +	* and we have not ascertained the source
>> +	* of the breakpoint, log it as spurious.
>> +	*/
>
> Ahem...
>
>
>

It matches the comments in the other section os code.  So what is
wrong with this.  The rest of the file uses the exact same comment
style.

Please help me with this.

Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/