Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:12:12PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:58:51 +0100
> 
> A few checks would be performed by the mgc_process_recover_log() function
> even though it was determined that the passed variable "pages" contained
> a null pointer or a call of the alloc_page() function failed.
> 
> 1. Let us return directly if a call of the kcalloc() function failed.
> 
> 2. Corresponding implementation details could be improved by adjustments
>    for jump targets according to the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> 3. Delete sanity checks then.
> 
> 4. Move an assignment for the variable "eof" behind memory allocations.
> 
> 5. The variable "req" will eventually be set to an appropriate pointer
>    from a call of the ptlrpc_request_alloc() function.
>    Thus let us omit the explicit initialisation before.
> 
> 6. Apply a recommendation from the script "checkpatch.pl".

That's 6 different things, shouldn't this be 6 different patches?

please redo.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/