Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

[Ezequiel Garcia]

This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work!

On 15 December 2015 at 02:59, Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other
> NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why
> onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c).
>
> Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable.
> We create struct nand_bbt to take place of nand_chip in nand_bbt.c.
> Struct nand_bbt contains all the information BBT needed from outside and
> it should be embedded into NAND family chip struct (such as struct nand_chip).
> NAND family driver should allocate, initialize and free struct nand_bbt.
>
> Below is mtd folder structure we want:
>         mtd
>         âââ Kconfig
>         âââ Makefile
>         âââ ...
>         âââ nand_bbt.c

Hm.. I'm not sure about having nand_bbt.c in drivers/mtd.
What's wrong with drivers/mtd/nand ?

In fact, I  was thinking we could go further and clean up the directories a bit
by separating core code, from controllers code, from SPI NAND code:

drivers/mtd/nand/
drivers/mtd/nand/controllers
drivers/mtd/nand/spi

Makes any sense?
-- 
Ezequiel GarcÃa, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/