[PATCH 07/42] ACPICA: exmutex: General cleanup, restructured some code
From: Lv Zheng
Date: Tue Dec 29 2015 - 00:54:41 EST
From: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
ACPICA commit c2a7d000b6be34313b1c50c8a718df16113f0f32
Should be no functional change.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/c2a7d000
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/exmutex.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exmutex.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exmutex.c
index a97f520..843c60a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exmutex.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exmutex.c
@@ -185,8 +185,9 @@ acpi_ex_acquire_mutex_object(u16 timeout,
if (obj_desc == acpi_gbl_global_lock_mutex) {
status = acpi_ev_acquire_global_lock(timeout);
} else {
- status = acpi_ex_system_wait_mutex(obj_desc->mutex.os_mutex,
- timeout);
+ status =
+ acpi_ex_system_wait_mutex(obj_desc->mutex.os_mutex,
+ timeout);
}
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
@@ -243,20 +244,30 @@ acpi_ex_acquire_mutex(union acpi_operand_object *time_desc,
}
/*
- * Current sync level must be less than or equal to the sync level of the
- * mutex. This mechanism provides some deadlock prevention
+ * Current sync level must be less than or equal to the sync level
+ * of the mutex. This mechanism provides some deadlock prevention.
*/
if (walk_state->thread->current_sync_level > obj_desc->mutex.sync_level) {
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
- "Cannot acquire Mutex [%4.4s], current SyncLevel is too large (%u)",
+ "Cannot acquire Mutex [%4.4s], "
+ "current SyncLevel is too large (%u)",
acpi_ut_get_node_name(obj_desc->mutex.node),
walk_state->thread->current_sync_level));
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_MUTEX_ORDER);
}
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
+ "Acquiring: Mutex SyncLevel %u, Thread SyncLevel %u, "
+ "Depth %u TID %p\n",
+ obj_desc->mutex.sync_level,
+ walk_state->thread->current_sync_level,
+ obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth,
+ walk_state->thread));
+
status = acpi_ex_acquire_mutex_object((u16)time_desc->integer.value,
obj_desc,
walk_state->thread->thread_id);
+
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth == 1) {
/* Save Thread object, original/current sync levels */
@@ -272,6 +283,12 @@ acpi_ex_acquire_mutex(union acpi_operand_object *time_desc,
acpi_ex_link_mutex(obj_desc, walk_state->thread);
}
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
+ "Acquired: Mutex SyncLevel %u, Thread SyncLevel %u, Depth %u\n",
+ obj_desc->mutex.sync_level,
+ walk_state->thread->current_sync_level,
+ obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth));
+
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
@@ -356,9 +373,9 @@ acpi_status
acpi_ex_release_mutex(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state)
{
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
u8 previous_sync_level;
struct acpi_thread_state *owner_thread;
+ acpi_status status = AE_OK;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ex_release_mutex);
@@ -409,7 +426,8 @@ acpi_ex_release_mutex(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
*/
if (obj_desc->mutex.sync_level != owner_thread->current_sync_level) {
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
- "Cannot release Mutex [%4.4s], SyncLevel mismatch: mutex %u current %u",
+ "Cannot release Mutex [%4.4s], SyncLevel mismatch: "
+ "mutex %u current %u",
acpi_ut_get_node_name(obj_desc->mutex.node),
obj_desc->mutex.sync_level,
walk_state->thread->current_sync_level));
@@ -424,6 +442,15 @@ acpi_ex_release_mutex(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
previous_sync_level =
owner_thread->acquired_mutex_list->mutex.original_sync_level;
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
+ "Releasing: Object SyncLevel %u, Thread SyncLevel %u, "
+ "Prev SyncLevel %u, Depth %u TID %p\n",
+ obj_desc->mutex.sync_level,
+ walk_state->thread->current_sync_level,
+ previous_sync_level,
+ obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth,
+ walk_state->thread));
+
status = acpi_ex_release_mutex_object(obj_desc);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
@@ -436,6 +463,14 @@ acpi_ex_release_mutex(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
owner_thread->current_sync_level = previous_sync_level;
}
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
+ "Released: Object SyncLevel %u, Thread SyncLevel, %u, "
+ "Prev SyncLevel %u, Depth %u\n",
+ obj_desc->mutex.sync_level,
+ walk_state->thread->current_sync_level,
+ previous_sync_level,
+ obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth));
+
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
@@ -462,21 +497,17 @@ void acpi_ex_release_all_mutexes(struct acpi_thread_state *thread)
union acpi_operand_object *next = thread->acquired_mutex_list;
union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc;
- ACPI_FUNCTION_NAME(ex_release_all_mutexes);
+ ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ex_release_all_mutexes);
/* Traverse the list of owned mutexes, releasing each one */
while (next) {
obj_desc = next;
- next = obj_desc->mutex.next;
-
- obj_desc->mutex.prev = NULL;
- obj_desc->mutex.next = NULL;
- obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth = 0;
-
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
- "Force-releasing held mutex: %p\n",
- obj_desc));
+ "Mutex [%4.4s] force-release, SyncLevel %u Depth %u\n",
+ obj_desc->mutex.node->name.ascii,
+ obj_desc->mutex.sync_level,
+ obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth));
/* Release the mutex, special case for Global Lock */
@@ -489,14 +520,21 @@ void acpi_ex_release_all_mutexes(struct acpi_thread_state *thread)
acpi_os_release_mutex(obj_desc->mutex.os_mutex);
}
- /* Mark mutex unowned */
-
- obj_desc->mutex.owner_thread = NULL;
- obj_desc->mutex.thread_id = 0;
-
/* Update Thread sync_level (Last mutex is the important one) */
thread->current_sync_level =
obj_desc->mutex.original_sync_level;
+
+ /* Mark mutex unowned */
+
+ next = obj_desc->mutex.next;
+
+ obj_desc->mutex.prev = NULL;
+ obj_desc->mutex.next = NULL;
+ obj_desc->mutex.acquisition_depth = 0;
+ obj_desc->mutex.owner_thread = NULL;
+ obj_desc->mutex.thread_id = 0;
}
+
+ return_VOID;
}
--
1.7.10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/