Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bpf: hash: use per-bucket spinlock

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 12/29/2015 03:40 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Both htab_map_update_elem() and htab_map_delete_elem() can be
> called from eBPF program, and they may be in kernel hot path,
> so it isn't efficient to use a per-hashtable lock in this two
> helpers.
>
> The per-hashtable spinlock is used for protecting bucket's
> hlist, and per-bucket lock is just enough. This patch converts
> the per-hashtable lock into per-bucket spinlock, so that
> contention can be decreased a lot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>

Looks better, thanks!

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/