Re: [PATCH] i915: correctly handling failed allocation
From: Jani Nikula
Date: Wed Dec 30 2015 - 04:17:09 EST
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Insu Yun <wuninsu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <wuninsu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> index a5e99ac..4e279dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> @@ -666,6 +666,8 @@ struct drm_panel *vbt_panel_init(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, u16 panel_id)
>
> /* This is cheating a bit with the cleanup. */
> vbt_panel = devm_kzalloc(dev->dev, sizeof(*vbt_panel), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbt_pannel)
> + return NULL;
We have build bots and CI, but the least you must do is build the code
you change before submitting patches.
BR,
Jani.
>
> vbt_panel->intel_dsi = intel_dsi;
> drm_panel_init(&vbt_panel->panel);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/