On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx> wrote:
[Rob]
I agree the generic version is fine (or find who made the first part
;)). What "pisosr" is is not very obvious though. Having 74165 in the
compatible would make it somewhat more obvious it is a standard logic
part.
A quick search shows shift-registers being made from vacuum tubes for
the Colossus! Those might work with this driver if you could match the
voltage to an SPI bus... :)
I agree about the name not being very good, but I'm not sure about
74165 ether as it is also just a single part number.
We can add many compatible strings so it's not an issue.
"ti,74165" works for me as TI invented the 74xx series.
The idea was to
have a non-part number compatible string for any shift-register you
can hook to the SPI line.
Again, one does not exclude the other. I'm happy with a generic
compatible *and* "ti,74165".
That way when we have boards with a sn65x882
or something we wont have to call it a 74165. But I guess that's why
it's a "compatible:" string, and not "is-a:" string.
Compatible ranges from the specific to the more generic
so compatible = "ti,74165", "pisosr"; is just fine. Something
will match if there is a suitable driver. The OS may choose to
provide something part-specific or something more generic.
Yours,--
Linus Walleij