2015-12-31 22:40 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx <mailto:arnd@xxxxxxxx>>:
>
> On Thursday 31 December 2015 22:12:19 Rongrong Zou wrote:
> > å 2015/12/30 17:06, Arnd Bergmann åé:
> > > On Tuesday 29 December 2015 21:33:52 Rongrong Zou wrote:
> > >> +Example:
> > >> +
> > >> + lpc_0: lpc@a01b0000 {
> > >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> > >> + #size-cells = <1>;
> > >> + compatible = "low-pin-count";
> > >> + reg = <0x0 0xa01b0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > >> + };
> > >
> > > One more thought: please try to stick as closely as possible to the existing
> > > ISA binding that is documented at
> > >
> > > http://www.firmware.org/1275/bindings/isa/isa0_4d.ps
> > From the specification, I think I should use 2 32bit integer to describe the isa addr in dts.
> > >
> > > In particular, this should cover the possibility of describing both memory
> > > and I/O spaces in child devices.
> > >
> >
> > I found below config in powerpc dts "arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8544ds.dts"
> >
> > isa@1e {
> > device_type = "isa";
> > #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > #size-cells = <1>;
> > #address-cells = <2>;
> > reg = <0xf000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> > ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x1000000 0x0 0x0
> > 0x1000>;
> > interrupt-parent = <&i8259>;
> >
> >
> >
> > rtc@70 {
> > compatible = "pnpPNP,b00";
> > reg = <0x1 0x70 0x2>;
> > };
> > the isa space in child-node: reg = <0x1 0x70 0x2>;
> > 0x1 means IO space, 70 means addr, 0x2 is size.
> > but when i config the following in dts, the ipmi_0 node can't be probed,
> > I think there may be some problems.
> >
> > lpc_0: lpc@a01b0000 {
> > compatible = "low-pin-count";
> > device_type = "isa";
> > #address-cells = <2>;
> > #size-cells = <1>;
> > reg = <0x0 0xa01b0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> >
> > ipmi_0:ipmi@000000e4{
> > device_type = "ipmi";
> > compatible = "ipmi-bt";
> > reg = <0x1 0x000000e4 0x4>;
> > };
>
> The DT sample above looks good in principle. I believe what you are missing
> here is code in your driver to scan the child nodes to create the platform
> devices. of_bus_isa_translate() should work with your definition here
> and create the correct IORESOURCE_IO resources. You don't have any MMIO
> resources, so the absence of a ranges property is ok. Maybe all you
> are missing is a call to of_platform_populate() or of_platform_bus_probe()?
>
You are right. thanks, i'll try on test board . if i get the correct result , the new patch
will be sent later. By the way, it's my another email account use when i at home.
> Arnd