RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Add lowest-priority support for vt-d posted-interrupts

[Wu, Feng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Radim Krčmář [mailto:rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 1:22 AM
> To: Wu, Feng <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Add lowest-priority support for vt-d
> posted-interrupts
> 
> 2015-12-16 09:37+0800, Feng Wu:
> > Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts for
> > VT-d posted-interrupts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > @@ -10702,8 +10702,16 @@ static int vmx_update_pi_irte(struct kvm
> *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
> >  		 */
> >
> >  		kvm_set_msi_irq(e, &irq);
> > -		if (!kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu(kvm, &irq, &vcpu))
> > -			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (!kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu(kvm, &irq, &vcpu)) {
> > +			if (!kvm_vector_hashing_enabled() ||
> > +					irq.delivery_mode !=
> APIC_DM_LOWEST)
> 
> Hm, wouldn't it actually be easier to extend kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu()
> with vector hashing? :)

Yes, it is a good idea, I will try that! Thanks a lot!

Thanks,
Feng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/