On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:16:52AM -0500, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:I didn't mean to imply that the VT subsystem itself was necessarily responsible for any space savings, I simply intended to point out that savings of a few pages can make a difference.
And those embedded devices can almost certainly save more by just notAnd a few pages can make a difference on _any_ device, not just an embedded
including the vt layer.
system. For a purpose specific system, that can be the difference between
fitting the working set in memory and having to hit swap space.
No one has proven any memory savings yet, so why are you saying this is
noticable?