Hi Eric,
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:26:33 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tuesday 05 January 2016 13:22:49 Stephen Warren wrote:
branches:
drm-vc4-next
bcm2835-dt-next
bcm2835-soc-next
bcm2835-drivers-next
bcm2385-defconfig-next
(bcm2835-maintainers-next is a placeholder since we have nothing for it
this round)
Typically maintainers merge everything together into a single "for-next"
to maintain a reasonable set of branches. I guess it doesn't affect me
so my opinion isn't too relevant though:-)
In my experience the common for-next branch works best because
you can change the set of branches that get merged into it as
needed. If there are 6 branches today, it's quite likely that there
will be another one in the future and if only one branch gets
merged into for-next, you don't need to worry about updating the list.
Certainly, that would be easier for me. Though you may want to keep
the drm-vc4-next branch separate since that get merged via a different
tree (and can appear at a different point in my merge list).
It does mean an extra step for you i.e. you would need to merge all the
relevant branches into the single "for-next" branch, but that should
not be too big an imposition.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tegra/maint-scripts.git/tree/