Re: [PATCH] DT: i2c: Update vendor prefix for 24c00
From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Wed Jan 06 2016 - 03:56:13 EST
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:22:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > "at" is not a valid vendor prefix, correcting the same to "atmel"
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'm afraid you can't just do this change alone as it's used in some
> >> DTS. Though you may deprecated it along with update of current users.
> >
> > Well, in Linux, I2C core currently strips the vendor anyhow. This will
> > probably be changed somewhen (tm), but for now, the impact for Linux
> > should be extremly close to 0.
>
> Okay, no objections to the original patch then.
Heh, I just go reminded that eeproms already have a seperate binding
description (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt).
I will update the eeprom bindings and remove the entries from trivial
devices.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature