[PATCH 8/8] perf test: add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR

[kan . liang]

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>

Extend sample-parsing test cases to support new sample type
PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index 5f23710..8813fa1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR)
 		COMP(addr);
 
+	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
+		COMP(phys_addr);
+
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_ID)
 		COMP(id);
 
@@ -303,7 +306,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(int subtest __maybe_unused)
 	 * were added.  Please actually update the test rather than just change
 	 * the condition below.
 	 */
-	if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR << 1) {
+	if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) {
 		pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/