Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] rdma controller support

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 01:31:06AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >  What I was
> > trying to say was that unless the number is extremely high, it'd be
> > far simpler to hard code them in the rdma controller and let drivers
> > enable the ones which apply to them.
> 
> Instead of in rdma controller, its hard coded in IB stack.
> I see this as an advantage where resource definition ownership remains
> with IB stack maintainers, rather than rdma cgroup maintainer.
> rdma cgroup maintainer doesn't have to understand what SRQ vs QP or
> ODP type MR or multicast group is.
> IB stack maintainer is better placed to judge and define it.
> 
> I would like to hear from Jason, Doug, Liran and other RDMA experts
> about their thoughts.

That's fine.  Make it a header file in IB stack which is included from
the rdma cgroup controller.  The only things are not building a huge
dynamic framework for something which can easily be a simple static
thing and having some oversight in adding resource types.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun