Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] rdma controller support

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Parav.

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:16:59AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Let me think through it. Its been late night for me currently. So dont
> want to conclude in hurry.

Sure thing.

> At high level it looks doable by maintaining hash table head on per
> device basis, that further reduces hash contention by one level.
> I will get back on this tomorrow.

Hmmm... why would it need a hash table?  Let's say there's a struct
rdma_device for each rdma_device and then that stuct can simply have
rdma_device->res_table[] or whatever to track limits and consumptions
and rdma_device->res_enabled mask to tell which resources are enabled
on the device.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun