[PATCH 4/6] cgroup: use ->subtree_control when testing no internal process rule

[Tejun Heo]

No internal process rule is enforced by cgroup_migrate_prepare_dst()
during process migration.  It tests whether the target cgroup's
->child_subsys_mask is zero which is different from "subtree_control"
write path which tests ->subtree_control.  This hasn't mattered
because up until now, both ->child_subsys_mask and ->subtree_control
are zero or non-zero at the same time.  However, with the planned
addition of implicit controllers, this will no longer be true.

This patch prepares for the change by making
cgorup_migrate_prepare_dst() test ->subtree_control instead.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/cgroup.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 8a92043..8bc83fd 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2512,11 +2512,11 @@ static int cgroup_migrate_prepare_dst(struct cgroup *dst_cgrp,
 	lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
 
 	/*
-	 * Except for the root, child_subsys_mask must be zero for a cgroup
+	 * Except for the root, subtree_control must be zero for a cgroup
 	 * with tasks so that child cgroups don't compete against tasks.
 	 */
 	if (dst_cgrp && cgroup_on_dfl(dst_cgrp) && cgroup_parent(dst_cgrp) &&
-	    dst_cgrp->child_subsys_mask)
+	    dst_cgrp->subtree_control)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	/* look up the dst cset for each src cset and link it to src */
-- 
2.5.0