Re: [PATCH 1b/1] serial: sh-sci: Remove cpufreq notifier to fix crash/deadlock
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Jan 08 2016 - 00:09:13 EST
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 07:36:37PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The BSP team noticed that there is spin/mutex lock issue on sh-sci when
> CPUFREQ is used. The issue is that the notifier function may call
> mutex_lock() while the spinlock is held, which can lead to a BUG().
> This may happen if CPUFREQ is changed while another CPU calls
> clk_get_rate().
>
> Taking the spinlock was added to the notifier function in commit
> e552de2413edad1a ("sh-sci: add platform device private data"), to
> protect the list of serial ports against modification during traversal.
> At that time the Common Clock Framework didn't exist yet, and
> clk_get_rate() just returned clk->rate without taking a mutex.
> Note that since commit d535a2305facf9b4 ("serial: sh-sci: Require a
> device per port mapping."), there's no longer a list of serial ports to
> traverse, and taking the spinlock became superfluous.
>
> To fix the issue, just remove the cpufreq notifier:
> 1. The notifier doesn't work correctly: all it does is update stored
> clock rates; it does not update the divider in the hardware.
> The divider will only be updated when calling sci_set_termios().
> I believe this was broken back in 2004, when the old
> drivers/char/sh-sci.c driver (where the notifier did update the
> divider) was replaced by drivers/serial/sh-sci.c (where the
> notifier just updated port->uartclk).
> Cfr. full-history-linux commits 6f8deaef2e9675d9 ("[PATCH] sh: port
> sh-sci driver to the new API") and 3f73fe878dc9210a ("[PATCH]
> Remove old sh-sci driver").
> 2. On modern SoCs, the sh-sci parent clock rate is no longer related
> to the CPU clock rate anyway, so using a cpufreq notifier is
> futile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This version applies against scif-clk-sck-brg-for-v4.5.
I took this version. If the 1a needs to go to 4.4-stable, email it, and
the git commit id to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx when this ends up in Linus's
tree.
thanks,
greg k-h