Re: 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qeth_core_set_online()

[Ursula Braun]

On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 08:18 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > As Heiko already answered, you could propose a lot of this kind of changes
> > with just minor benefit. I do not want to push them in single patches.
> 
> Thanks for your clarification.
> 
> 
> > Either there is a cleanup patch for explicit initialisation of
> > local variables in the whole qeth driver,
> 
> Is there any more fine-tuning cooking in the background?
Not yet; qeth is an important driver for Linux on System z; there are
lots of investigation ideas for improvements, which we will take care
about according to their priorities. I regard your proposed fine-tuning
code change as valid, but prioritize it as one with lowest benefit,
since it does not really make a difference once compiled.
> 
> 
> > or we take care about such minor changes, once we touch the code anyway
> 
> How often will this really happen?
There is no general rule. Check our git history to answer this question.
> 
> 
> > due to other reasons.
> 
> I am curious which ones will trigger further related software improvements.
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
>