From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diddfunc.c: In function 'connect_didd':
drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diddfunc.c:77:1: warning: the frame size
of 1152 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
gcc version 5.3.1 20151219 (Ubuntu 5.3.1-4ubuntu1)
Cc: Armin Schindler <mac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Karsten Keil <isdn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diddfunc.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diddfunc.c
b/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diddfunc.c
index b0b23ed..a9feb4f 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diddfunc.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/diddfunc.c
@@ -52,9 +52,13 @@ static int __init connect_didd(void)
int x = 0;
int dadapter = 0;
IDI_SYNC_REQ req;
- DESCRIPTOR DIDD_Table[MAX_DESCRIPTORS];
+ DESCRIPTOR *DIDD_Table;
- DIVA_DIDD_Read(DIDD_Table, sizeof(DIDD_Table));
+ DIDD_Table = kcalloc(MAX_DESCRIPTORS, sizeof(*DIDD_Table),
GFP_KERNEL);
Previously the array didn't seem to be zeroed, perhaps it's better to
use kmalloc_array()?
[...]
The last patch in the series (isdn: eicon: consolidate descriptor
allocation) consolidates the allocation code into one function. I used
kmalloc() there because I noticed that diva_didd_read_adapter_array()
does zero the buffer before using it.
Do you think that is sufficient ?
rtg