Hi Guenter
You fix looks right, but i'm wondering about the code which is being
fixed.
How can phydev ever evaluate to true, given the break statement? Can
this code every detect multiple PHYs? I think not.
Either the break needs to be removed, or we just replace the whole lot
with phy_find_first().
Hi Andrew,
you are right, the current code is pretty pointless.
I would suggest to use phy_find_first().
Me too.
Should I submit a separate patch, or replace my patch with v2 ?
I say a v2 which uses phy_find_first() and include in the changelog
why the current code is pointless and so the change to
phy_find_first().