Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters

From: Suzuki K. Poulose
Date: Mon Jan 11 2016 - 05:58:53 EST


On 11/01/16 10:50, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:54:46AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
Adds helper routines to disable the counter controls for
all the counters on the CCI PMU and restore it back, by
preserving the original state in caller provided mask.

Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index a3938ef..2f1fcf0 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -672,6 +672,44 @@ static void pmu_set_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx, unsigned long event)
}

/*
+ * For all counters on the CCI-PMU, disable any 'enabled' counters,
+ * saving the changed counters in the mask, so that we can restore
+ * it later using pmu_restore_counters. The mask is private to the
+ * caller. We cannot rely on the used_mask maintained by the CCI_PMU
+ * as it only tells us if the counter is assigned to perf_event or not.
+ * The state of the perf_event cannot be locked by the PMU layer, hence
+ * we check the individual counter status (which can be locked by
+ * cci_pm->hw_events->pmu_lock).
+ *
+ * @mask should be initialised by the caller.

We should probably state "initialised to zero", or "empty".

Yep, will fix it.

+/*
+ * Restore the status of the counters. Reversal of the pmu_disable_counters().
+ * For each counter set in the mask, enable the counter back.
+ */

Shouldn't that say pmu_save_counters?

Yea, missed it in rebase.

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>


Thanks
Suzuki