Re: [PATCH] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice
From: Cyrille Pitchen
Date: Mon Jan 11 2016 - 11:33:35 EST
Hi Mans,
Le 11/01/2016 16:26, Nicolas Ferre a écrit :
> Le 08/01/2016 01:11, Mans Rullgard a écrit :
[...]
>> @@ -1569,13 +1576,6 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> atmel_get_caps(as);
>>
>> - as->use_cs_gpios = true;
>> - if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) &&
>
> I don't see this atmel_spi_is_v2() test in the resulting code anymore:
> did you make sure that the v1 of the peripheral is protected?
>
>> - !of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL)) {
>> - as->use_cs_gpios = false;
>> - master->num_chipselect = 4;
>
> This line is pretty important: you mustn't remove it blindly!
>
>
Actually, few lines above master->num_chipselect is initialized with:
master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
[...]
master->num_chipselect = master->dev.of_node ? 0 : 4;
So 0 in the case of DT support, 4 otherwise.
Now looking at the source code of spi_register_master(), this function:
1 - calls of_spi_register_master(), which initializes master->num_chipselect:
nb = of_gpio_name_count(np, "cs-gpios");
master->num_chipselect = max_t(int, nb, master->num_chipselect);
if (nb == 0 || nb == -ENOENT)
return 0;
2 - check master->num_chipselect with:
if (master->num_chipselect == 0)
return -EINVAL;
It means that in the case of DT support, master->num_chipselect was initialized
according to the value of the "cs-gpios" DT property. Hence this property used
to be mandatory but now we want it to be optional for hardware version 2 and
later.
This is why we added a check "hw version >= 2 and cs-gpios missing". In such
a case the master->num_chipselect was initialized to 4 so spi_register_master()
does not fail with -EINVAL.
I have applied the following fix after your patch and now the driver works
again on sama5d2:
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
@@ -1576,6 +1576,11 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
atmel_get_caps(as);
+ if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) &&
+ master->dev.of_node &&
+ !of_get_property(master->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL))
+ master->num_chipselect = 4;
+
as->use_dma = false;
as->use_pdc = false;
if (as->caps.has_dma_support) {
>> - }
>> -
>> as->use_dma = false;
>> as->use_pdc = false;
>> if (as->caps.has_dma_support) {
>>
>
> So, sorry but it's a NACK for me.
>
> Bye,
>
Best regards,
Cyrille