Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: add regulators support

From: Srinivas Kandagatla
Date: Tue Jan 12 2016 - 09:30:52 EST




On 12/01/16 13:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 12 January 2016 13:46:32 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
};

+ smd {
+ rpm {
+ rpm-requests {
+ pm8916-regulators {
+
+ vdd_l1_l2_l3-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
+ vdd_l5-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
+ vdd_l4_l5_l6-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
+ vdd_l7-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
+


If you're nested this deeply, you should consider using labels, e.g.

Labels are good and works for me.

Stephen/Andy are you ok to use labels for such deeply nested nodes in board dts?

/ {
...

smd {
rpm {
rpm-requests {
regulators: pm8916-regulators {

};
};
};
};

...
};


&regulators {
vdd_l1_l2_l3-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
vdd_l5-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
vdd_l4_l5_l6-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
vdd_l7-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;

s1 {
regulator-min-microvolt = <375000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1562000>;
};

s3 {
regulator-min-microvolt = <375000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1562000>;
};

...
};

btw, it seems odd to me that all those nodes under 'smd'
have names but no addresses.
These regulators are identified by the node names, and have no addresses associated with it as control goes over SMD based IPC to the rpm.

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.txt?id=refs/tags/next-20160112

--srini


Arnd