On 14.01.2016 03:57, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Hi Mark,
when working on unification of Max77620, MAX77686 RTC driver, I came to
need of APIs from regmap to add the device as devres.
int dev_add_regmap(dev, regmap);
This will add the regmap in the dev resource of device. This will help
to get the regmap handle from device using dev_get_regmap(). This APIs
will be different from the regmap_attach_dev() where map->dev is moved
to new device.
The requirement came from multiple i2c slave address device like MAX77620.
MAX77620 has 2 i2c address 0x3C and 0x68. 0x68 is for RTC IP block.
we register device with 0x3C and create dummy i2c client for 0x68 inside
driver.
We create two regmap, one from 0x3C i2c client as rmap_0x3c and other
from 0x68 i2c dummy client rmap_0x68.
Now in RTC driver(mfd device), we have the parent device as dev_0x3c.
When we try to get the regmap handle, we only get one regmap per device
as we register regmap with different devices.
If I had above API then I can add the rmap_0x68 in the dev_0x3c as
dev_res. By this I can have two regmap list on dev_0x3c and get rmap
handle by dev_get_regmap(dev_0x3c, "pmic-slave") and
dev_get_regmap(dev_0x3c, "rtc-slave");
I like to know your comment on this approach to add the regmap on
different device resource.
As I pointed on previous discussions (e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/11/1158 ) the child should be responsible
for its I2C dummy device and regmap. You ignored that idea previously -
dunno why.
Just don't create the RTC regmap in parent MFD. Let the child manage its
resources. That is the real decoupling.