Re: [Gta04-owner] [PATCH 0/4] UART slave device support - version 4
From: H. Nikolaus Schaller
Date: Fri Jan 15 2016 - 15:35:45 EST
Am 15.01.2016 um 20:40 schrieb Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>:
> On Fri 2016-01-15 10:34:51, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Am 13.01.2016 um 20:15 schrieb Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:28:00PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>> Hi Tomeu,
>>>>
>>>> Am 12.01.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11 May 2015 at 03:56, NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> here is version 4 of my "UART slave device" patch set, previously
>>>>>> known as "tty slave devices".
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Neil,
>>>>>
>>>>> do you (or someone else) have plans to continue this work in the short
>>>>> or medium term?
>>>>
>>>> yes, there is something in our upstreaming pipeline. This one works for us on top of 4.4.0:
>>>>
>>>> <http://git.goldelico.com/?p=gta04-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/work/hns/misc/w2sg-tty-slave2-v4>
>>>>
>>>> There is one point still to be solved: the exact style of the DT bindings.
>>>>
>>>> We have an idea how a driver can implement two different styles (child node AND phandle)
>>>> so that it is up to the DTS developer to use the one that best fits into the existing DTS.
>>>
>>> From my perspective as a binding maintainer, and as I stated before, the
>>> child node approach made the most sense and was most consistent with the
>>
>>> way we handle other devices.
>>
>> I simply don't see that this is the most common way other devices
>> are handled.
>
> You promised to shut up once maintainers speak, that happened, and you
> did not shut up. Just do it now.
Nobody has asked for your unqualified and not helpful comments.
So please shut up yourself and stop to disturb Free Software projects.