Re: [PATCH v3 03/15] block, dax: fix lifetime of in-kernel dax mappings with dax_map_atomic()

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Jan 18 2016 - 05:42:54 EST


Hi Dan,

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The DAX implementation needs to protect new calls to ->direct_access()
> and usage of its return value against unbind of the underlying block
> device. Use blk_queue_enter()/blk_queue_exit() to either prevent
> blk_cleanup_queue() from proceeding, or fail the dax_map_atomic() if the
> request_queue is being torn down.

> index f8e543839e5c..a480729c00ec 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c

> static ssize_t dax_io(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *iter,
> loff_t start, loff_t end, get_block_t get_block,
> struct buffer_head *bh)
> {
> - ssize_t retval = 0;
> - loff_t pos = start;
> - loff_t max = start;
> - loff_t bh_max = start;
> - void __pmem *addr;
> + loff_t pos = start, max = start, bh_max = start;
> + struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
> + int rw = iov_iter_rw(iter), rc;

fs/dax.c:138: warning: ârcâ may be used uninitialized in this function

rc will be uninitialized if start == end, and the while loop below is never
executed. I don't know whether it's 100% guaranteed this isn't the case.

Note that the old retval was preinitialized to 0.

> + long map_len = 0;
> + unsigned long pfn;
> + void __pmem *addr = NULL;
> + void __pmem *kmap = (void __pmem *) ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> bool hole = false;
> bool need_wmb = false;
>
> - if (iov_iter_rw(iter) != WRITE)
> + if (rw == READ)
> end = min(end, i_size_read(inode));
>
> while (pos < end) {

> @@ -175,8 +219,9 @@ static ssize_t dax_io(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *iter,
>
> if (need_wmb)
> wmb_pmem();
> + dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, kmap);
>
> - return (pos == start) ? retval : pos - start;
> + return (pos == start) ? rc : pos - start;
> }


Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds