Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.4

[Michael Ellerman]

On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 08:32 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 09:44 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 12:38 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Hi GÃnter,
> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:29:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > > > <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > JFYI, when comparing v4.4[1] to v4.4-rc8[3], the summaries are:
> > > > > >    - build errors: +13/-13
> > > > > > [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/9774/ (all 259 configs)
> > > > > 
> > > > >    + /tmp/ccnzCwY6.s: Error: can't resolve `_start' {*UND* section} -
> > > > > `L0^A' {.text section}:  => 43
> > > > >    + /tmp/ccyAN6Ix.s: Error: can't resolve `_start' {*UND* section} -
> > > > > `L0^A' {.text section}:  => 43
> > > > > 
> > > > > Various MIPS, the saga continues...
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Geert,
> > > > 
> > > > do you know which version of binutils is used by kisskb ?
> > > > If it is 2.23.90 or similar (ie below 2.24 and third level version
> > > > has more than one digit), there is a patch pending to fix it.
> > > 
> > > No, I don't know.
> > 
> > It dumps the GCC version, but not binutils. I should add that one day.
> > 
> > The mips toolchain is pretty old, so it's using binutils 2.22. Are you saying I
> > need to update it?
> > 
> Michael,
> 
> is your toolchain available somewhere as binary ? I'd like to add a single
> mips build test using it if possible.

Hi Guenter,

I'm still using this old one from kernel.org:

  https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/x86_64-gcc-4.6.3-nolibc_mips-linux.tar.bz2

cheers