Re: [PATCH] pci: fix unavailable irq number 255 reported by BIOS

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1/19/2016 9:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 02:43:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 09:45:13 AM Chen Fan wrote:
>>>> In our environment, when enable Secure boot, we found an abnormal
>>>> phenomenon as following call trace shows. after investigation, we
>>>> found the firmware assigned an irq number 255 which means unknown
>>>> or no connection in PCI local spec for i801_smbus, meanwhile the
>>>> ACPI didn't configure the pci irq routing. and the 255 irq number
>>>> was assigned for megasa msix without IRQF_SHARED. then in this case
>>>> during i801_smbus probe, the i801_smbus driver would request irq with
>>>> bad irq number 255. but the 255 irq number was assigned for memgasa
>>>> with MSIX enable. which will cause request_irq fails, and call trace
>>>> shows, actually, we should expose the error early, rather than in request
>>>> irq, here we simply fix the problem by return err when find the irq is
>>>> 255.
>>>>
>>>> See the call trace:
>>>>
>>>>  [   32.459195] ipmi device interface
>>>>  [   32.612907] shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
>>>>  [   32.800459] ixgbe: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver - version 4.0.1-k-rh
>>>>  [   32.818319] ixgbe: Copyright (c) 1999-2014 Intel Corporation.
>>>>  [   32.844009] lpc_ich 0001:80:1f.0: I/O space for ACPI uninitialized
>>>>  [   32.850093] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: enabling device (0140 -> 0143)
>>>>  [   32.851134] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT C
>>>>  [   32.851136] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C: no GSI
>>>>  [   32.851164] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 255. 00000080 (i801_smbus) vs. 00000000 (megasa
>>>>  [   32.851168] CPU: 0 PID: 2487 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1
>>>>  [   32.851170] Hardware name: FUJITSU PRIMEQUEST 2800E2/D3736, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 2000 Serie5
>>>>  [   32.851178] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
>>>>  [   32.851208]  ffff88086c330b00 00000000e233a9df ffff88086d57bca0 ffffffff81603f36
>>>>  [   32.851227]  ffff88086d57bcf8 ffffffff8110d23a ffff88686fe02000 0000000000000246
>>>>  [   32.851246]  ffff88086a9a8c00 00000000e233a9df ffffffffa00ad220 0000000000000080
>>>>  [   32.851247] Call Trace:
>>>>  [   32.851261]  [<ffffffff81603f36>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
>>>>  [   32.851271]  [<ffffffff8110d23a>] __setup_irq+0x54a/0x570
>>>>  [   32.851282]  [<ffffffffa00ad220>] ? i801_check_pre.isra.5+0xe0/0xe0 [i2c_i801]
>>>>  [   32.851289]  [<ffffffff8110d3bc>] request_threaded_irq+0xcc/0x170
>>>>  [   32.851298]  [<ffffffffa00ae87f>] i801_probe+0x32f/0x508 [i2c_i801]
>>>>  [   32.851308]  [<ffffffff81308385>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>>>>  [   32.851315]  [<ffffffff8108bfd4>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x14/0x20
>>>>  [   32.851323]  [<ffffffff8108f0ab>] process_one_work+0x17b/0x470
>>>>  [   32.851330]  [<ffffffff81090003>] worker_thread+0x293/0x400
>>>>  [   32.851338]  [<ffffffff8108fd70>] ? rescuer_thread+0x400/0x400
>>>>  [   32.851346]  [<ffffffff8109726f>] kthread+0xcf/0xe0
>>>>  [   32.851353]  [<ffffffff810971a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
>>>>  [   32.851362]  [<ffffffff81613cfc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>>>>  [   32.851369]  [<ffffffff810971a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
>>>>  [   32.851373] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to allocate irq 255: -16
>>>>  [   32.851435] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
>>>>  [   33.180145] ixgbe 0000:5a:00.0: Multiq[   33.240538] ixgbe 0000:5a:00.0: (PCI Express:03:e0
>>>>  [   33.280826] ixgbe 0000:5a:00.0: MAC: 3, PHY: 0, PBA No: 000000-000
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>>>> index d30184c..d2f47f8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>>>> @@ -439,9 +439,17 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>             if (acpi_isa_register_gsi(dev))
>>>>                     dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: no GSI\n",
>>>>                              pin_name(pin));
>>>> +           rc = 0;
>>>> +           /*
>>>> +            * Excluding the BIOS report the value 255, which meaning
>>>> +            * "unknown" or "no connection" in PCI Local Bus Specification
>>>> +            * Revision 3.0 February 3, 2004, P223.
>>>
>>> You mean the footnote on page 223 talking about the Interrupt Line values, right?
>
> "Unknown" does not necessarily mean invalid. I have a platform that is using 255 as a valid legacy
> interrupt on PCI Express.

So first off this is about the Interrupt Line value not about an
interrupt vector.

Second, the footnote in question is talking about x86 PCs, so if your
platform is not one of them, there is no connection here.

Which means that the change should be limited to x86 probably.

Thanks,
Rafael