Re: [RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:10:40PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:
> > - get_timeline_name and get_driver_name are imo too much indirection, just
> >   add ->(drv_)name field to each of these.
> 
> I don't think is a good idea to change that now as there are other fence
> users in the kernel using get_timeline_name and get_driver_name. What I
> propose is try get rid of this when moving ops from fences to
> fence_timeline.

Makes sense. And yeah I only realized after sending that this wasn't added
by your patches, just that your patches added the (core) users for it.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch