Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] ftrace with regs + live patching for ppc64 LE (ABI v2)

From: Torsten Duwe
Date: Wed Jan 20 2016 - 04:09:30 EST


On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:03:23PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 15:17 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2015-12-04 15:45:29, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > > Changes since v4:
> > > * change comment style in entry_64.S to C89
> > > (nobody is using assembler syntax comments there).
> > > * the bool function restore_r2 shouldn't return 2,
> > > that's a little confusing.
> > > * Test whether the compiler supports -mprofile-kernel
> > > and only then define CC_USING_MPROFILE_KERNEL
> > > * also make the return value of klp_check_compiler_support
> > > depend on that.
> >
> > Note that there is still needed the extra patch from
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2093867/focus=2099603
> > to get the livepatching working.
>
> Sorry which extra patch?
Message-ID: <20151203160004.GE8047@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
By Petr Mladek, "Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] ftrace with regs + live patching..."
2015-12-03. It is further up in the function call hierarchy and basically
tells the arch-independent KLP to call the normal entry point on ppc64le, and
that the _mcount call site is 16 bytes further.


> > Both ftrace with regs and live patching works for me with this patch
> > set and the extra patch. So. for the whole patchset:
> >
> > Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you give me some more info on how you're testing it? What config options,
> toolchain etc.?
>
> For me the series doesn't even boot, even with livepatching disabled.

May indeed be a toolchain issue. I had to fix gcc-4.8.5 to get "notrace" working
for -mprofile-kernel. That's a gcc bug.

What are you using?

The config in the v5 patch series should be waterproof, especially with KLP disabled
ftrace with regs must work (all self-tests succeeded). If you send me your config
(via PM I suggest, spare the lists) I can verify it with the toolchain here.
Petr made a suggestion to reshuffle the config options to have it cleaner;
I suggest to patch that separately.

Torsten