Re: [PATCH RFC 05/15] mmc: sunxi: Support MMC_DDR52 timing modes
From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Thu Jan 21 2016 - 06:55:33 EST
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21-01-16 06:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>
>> DDR transfer modes include UHS-1 DDR50 and MMC HS-DDR (or MMC_DDR52).
>> Consider MMC_DDR52 when setting clock delays.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>> index 4bec87458317..b403a2433eec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>> @@ -687,7 +687,8 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate(struct
>> sunxi_mmc_host *host,
>> oclk_dly = host->clk_delays[SDXC_CLK_25M].output;
>> sclk_dly = host->clk_delays[SDXC_CLK_25M].sample;
>> } else if (rate <= 50000000) {
>
>
> Shouldn't this be <= 52000000 then, considering that we may at one point get
> some PLL setup where we may actually be able to do 52000000 for
> MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52 ?
Given that mmc->f_max = 50000000, the core will never try any clock rate higher
than 50 MHz, and iirc clk_round_rate always rounds down. We could increase both
numbers at the same time when we actually encounter such hardware.
Or we could increase both now, which I actually did in an earlier version, but
it really made no difference with current hardware.
Regards
ChenYu
>
>> - if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50) {
>> + if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 ||
>> + ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) {
>> oclk_dly =
>> host->clk_delays[SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR].output;
>> sclk_dly =
>> host->clk_delays[SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR].sample;
>> } else {
>> @@ -762,7 +763,8 @@ static void sunxi_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc,
>> struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>
>> /* set ddr mode */
>> rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_GCTRL);
>> - if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50)
>> + if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 ||
>> + ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52)
>> rval |= SDXC_DDR_MODE;
>> else
>> rval &= ~SDXC_DDR_MODE;
>>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans