Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator
From: Mark Brown
Date: Thu Jan 21 2016 - 11:28:33 EST
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> I guess a separate driver would make it easier to deal with cases like
> the one you suggested (shutting down when the load is going to be
> lower). I don't see how we could have a good DT representation of that
> if we're going to use lists.
We can have a driver regardless of what the DT looks like, it's a
question of how things get instantiated.
> Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you
> prefer.
Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature