Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Use a bitfield for continuous_voltage_range

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 20:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Using a bitfield enables the compiler to lay out the structure more
> efficiently when we have other boolean flags since multiple values can
> be included in a single byte.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
> index 16ac9e108806..3ac0f306f033 100644
> --- a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
> +++ b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ struct regulator_desc {
>  			    const struct regulator_desc *,
>  			    struct regulator_config *);
>  	int id;
> -	bool continuous_voltage_range;
> +	unsigned int continuous_voltage_range:1;

Is this really valuable?

There are already padding bytes that are unused
and adding a couple more bools would be space
cost-free and more readable.

I believe that read/write of bytes is also more
efficient on some architectures than bit field
read/modify/write uses.

>  	unsigned n_voltages;
>  	const struct regulator_ops *ops;
>  	int irq;