Re: [BUG REPORT] Soft Lockup in smp_call_function_single+0xD8
From: Jeff Merkey
Date: Sun Jan 24 2016 - 20:43:51 EST
On 1/24/16, Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If I single step with either kgdb, kgdb, or mdb kernel debuggers over
> a sysret instruction anywhere in the OS, the system hard hangs in
> smp_call_function_single after the debugger releases the system and it
> resumes normal operation. The specific place the kernel hangs is in
> the loop below. The softlockup detector will periodically detect
> this condition when it occurs, but not always, most of the time the
> system is just hung and unresponsive.
>
> (2)> u smp_call_function_single+d8
> <<<< hard hang in this loop with EDX=3
> 0xffffffff810fce48 8B55E0 mov edx,DWORD PTR [rbp-32]=0xCE037DC0
> 0xffffffff810fce4b 83E201 and edx,0x1
> 0xffffffff810fce4e 75F6 jne
> smp_call_function_single+0xd6 (0xffffffff810fce46) (up)
> <<<<<
> 0xffffffff810fce50 EBC3 jmp
> smp_call_function_single+0xa5 (0xffffffff810fce15) (up)
> 0xffffffff810fce52 8B05E08EC700 mov eax,[oops_in_progress]=0x0
> 0xffffffff810fce58 85C0 test eax,eax
> 0xffffffff810fce5a 7585 jne
> smp_call_function_single+0x71 (0xffffffff810fcde1) (up)
> 0xffffffff810fce5c 803D8E0C9D0000 cmp [__warned.20610]=0x00,0x0
> 0xffffffff810fce63 0F8578FFFFFF jne
> smp_call_function_single+0x71 (0xffffffff810fcde1) (up)
> 0xffffffff810fce69 BE24010000 mov esi,0x124
> 0xffffffff810fce6e 48C7C796B08C81 mov rdi,0xffffffff818cb096
> 0xffffffff810fce75 894DBC mov DWORD PTR [rbp-68]=0x0,ecx
> 0xffffffff810fce78 488955C0 mov QWORD PTR
> [rbp-64]=0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFF10,rdx
> 0xffffffff810fce7c E8FF21F8FF call warn_slowpath_null
> 0xffffffff810fce81 C605690C9D0001 mov [__warned.20610]=0x00,0x1
> 0xffffffff810fce88 8B4DBC mov ecx,DWORD PTR [rbp-68]=0x0
> 0xffffffff810fce8b 488B55C0 mov rdx,QWORD PTR
> [rbp-64]=0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFF10
> 0xffffffff810fce8f E94DFFFFFF jmp
> smp_call_function_single+0x71 (0xffffffff810fcde1) (up)
> 0xffffffff810fce94 E8A71EF8FF call __stack_chk_fail
> 0xffffffff810fce99 0F1F8000000000 nop DWORD PTR [rax]=0x0
> (2)> g
>
>
> The stack backtrace when the bug occurs is:
>
> smp_call_function_single+0xd8
> unmap_page_range+0x613
> flush_tlb_func+0x0
> smp_call_function_many+215
> native_flush_tlb_others+0x118
> flush_tlb_mm_range+0x61
> tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly+0x6b
> tlb_finish_mmu+0x14
> unmap_region+0xe2
> vma_rb_erase+0x10f
> do_unmap+0x217
> vm_unmap+0x41
> SyS_munmap+0x22
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12
>
> I traced through this code a bunch of times in just normal operations
> without triggering the bug to get a feel for what it normally sees in
> EDX and it looks like someone has coded a looping function that always
> has EDX=0 in every case I saw in the except for when this bug occurs.
>
> So the exact C code this maps fro objdump of kernel/smp.o is:
>
> 469: e8 62 fe ff ff callq 2d0 <generic_exec_single>
> 46e: 8b 55 e0 mov -0x20(%rbp),%edx
> * previous function call. For multi-cpu calls its even more interesting
> * as we'll have to ensure no other cpu is observing our csd.
> */
> static void csd_lock_wait(struct call_single_data *csd)
> {
> while (smp_load_acquire(&csd->flags) & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
> 471: 83 e2 01 and $0x1,%edx
> 474: 74 cf je 445 <smp_call_function_single+0xa5>
> 476: f3 90 pause
> <<<<<<<<<<
> 478: 8b 55 e0 mov -0x20(%rbp),%edx
> 47b: 83 e2 01 and $0x1,%edx
> 47e: 75 f6 jne 476 <smp_call_function_single+0xd6>
> <<<<<<<<<<<
> 480: eb c3 jmp 445 <smp_call_function_single+0xa5>
> * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
> * We allow cpu's that are not yet online though, as no one else can
> * send smp call function interrupt to this cpu and as such deadlocks
> * can't happen.
> */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(this_cpu) && irqs_disabled()
>
> Each time this bug occurs csd->flags is always set to a value of 3 and
> never changes. When the system is just running normally, it seems to
> be 0 the rest of the time. Setting EDX=0 from the debugger console
> clears the hang condition and the system seems to recover except the
> system reports this error from the console when you attempt to load
> programs, indicating the ability of the system to load shared objects
> is fritzed.
>
> #
> # ls -l
> /lib64/libc.so.6 version GLI not found << this error and no shared
> objects will load
> #
> #
>
> Jeff
>
I am running down a trace of the MSR values for swapgs. Looks like it
got nested somewhere down in the entry_64 code. If so, then this is
just a symptom and not the sickness.
Jeff